Koay Su Lyn, Penang Institute
According to Sir Alexander Carr-Saunders, the architect of British colonial universities and Director of the London School of Economics from 1937 to 1957, there was ‘little sympathy with local aspirations for university education’ before World War II.1 Despite the vision of the Advisory Committee on Education in the Colonies (ACEC)2 for establishing elementary to secondary schools, as well as technical and vocational institutions up to the tertiary level in every colony, the idea for a Malayan university was not a colonial policy priority.
Pre-World War II Education in Malaya
Education in Malaya from early colonial times up to World War II was rudimentary, generally consisting of no more than five years of primary schooling. The teachings were vernacular, each divided along ethnic lines, financed and managed under different systems with different languages and syllabuses. For example, most Malay schools were attended by Malays, Chinese schools by Chinese, and Indian schools by Indians, each taught in their own languages and dialects. Only English schools, in the towns, were attended by all communities, where English was the sole medium of instruction.3
While Malay schools were created, financed and managed by the government, Chinese supported their own schools, and Indian schools were established and run by the estate owners with government subsidies. Only the English schools, many with roots in Christian mission schools, enjoyed the government’s financial support,4 and were confined to Malayans of the middle and upper classes.
The British colonial government maintained a tight pocket in the provision of education, especially higher education.5 It regarded the expansion of tertiary education in colonial India from the mid-19th century as a mistake given the production of overqualified, unemployable, politically ambitious and intractable young men. The colonial government prioritised the metropolitan funds that it could secure under the Colonial Development Act 1929 for economic development, seeing education as a product of social welfare that had to be met by local revenues.
Nevertheless, the development of a small pool of well-educated Malays was necessary to support colonial political and economic policies. Hence in 1905 the Malay College, and in 1922 the Sultan Idris Training College, were established, both of which aimed to groom a class of English-educated, Malay administrators.
.
In its early years, a handful of ‘commoners’ were admitted.8 Among them was Abdul Majid bin Zainuddin, who became a teacher in the college from 1907 to 1917. But his own son was later denied a place after a strict assertion by the Board of Governors that only the ‘princes and nobles of Malaya should be eligible for admission’. At most, only the sons of very minor headmen were passed by the Selection Boards.9
The College’s first headmaster was William Hargreaves, the former principal of the Penang Free School who was well known for enforcing high academic standards and encouraging Malay studies.10 Notwithstanding the emphasis on English, Malay was made compulsory, with Friday prayers and religious classes, dismissing potential fears that young Malays would be alienated from their own native tongue while absorbing English ideals. Preservation of their cultural identity was crucial because, as future administrators, graduates were expected to bridge the gap between the government and Malay society.
Despite the college’s restrictive, class-based admissions, the British solidified the trust and confidence of the ruling class, which helped to consolidate their control over the Malay states. The Sultan Idris Training College (SITC) was intended to serve a similar purpose, but through less exclusive social channels.
Admitting students from all walks of Malay society, the SITC functioned as the medium in which Malay teachers were trained and, later, supplied to Malay schools to equip ordinary Malays with new skills. This strategy of grooming an advanced batch of skilled Malay farmers, agriculturalists, fishermen and manual labourers would reduce the scepticism and insecurities of Malay parents. For that purpose, the SITC’s curriculum was agriculturally centred with a special emphasis on handicrafts, gardening, arts and physical training. Providing the highest degree of vernacular education in the Malay Peninsula, its student enrolment spanned Malaya—around one third from the Straits Settlements, some two thirds from the Federated Malay States and a scattering of students from Kedah and Johore. By 1931, around 130 students enrolled annually with a graduating class that retained as many as 120 students at the end of the three years. That year, the total number of students in residence was 390. By 1938, there were nearly 400 students, including 92 Malay girls.12
O.T. Dussek and the SITC’s Translation Bureau
While Winstedt wanted ordinary Malays to be trained to function within their traditional roles, things took a different turn with the appointment of O.T Dussek, a British education officer from the Malayan Education Service and the former headmaster of the Malacca College, as SITC’s first principal. A sympathiser of the Malays, he often encouraged them to strive for success through the cultivation of good leadership skills. It was Dussek’s strict policy of teaching only in Bahasa Melayu that sowed the seeds of nationalism by instilling a deep sense of pride in Malay culture, language and identity. The harvest was reaped with teachers like Abdul Hadi Hassan and Buyong Adil, who introduced radical concepts like the ‘Malay state’ and ‘Malay world’ to students. This was followed by the Malay Translation Bureau’s transfer from Kuala Lumpur to the SITC in 1924. Instrumental in its transfer, Dussek appointed the renowned Malay linguist, Zainal Abidin bin Ahmad, better known as Za’ba, to head the Bureau.13
The gem of the SITC, the Bureau was responsible for writing, translating, editing and seeing through the press educational publications, novels, books and translations for government departments. While it also functioned as a training centre for probationary translators,14 the bureau’s facilities cured the dearth of literature at the SITC. More interestingly, Za’ba arranged the printing of numerous Malay titles, which included banned, revolutionary literature from the Middle East and Indonesia. Inevitably, nationalist ideas became topics of discussion and these cultivated a sense of political awakening among young Malays. The rise of the Malay left in the years before World War II, with the formation of the Kesatuan Melayu Muda in 1938, marks a good example.
King Edward VII Medical College